Net Health (Casamba) Alternatives: Escaping the Legacy Software Trap in 2026

If you’re a skilled nursing facility (SNF) or outpatient therapy clinic owner struggling with Net Health’s acquisition aftermath—dealing with an interface that users call “extremely unreliable with daily connectivity issues,” documentation that takes an hour per eval, and server problems that lose your work mid-session—you’re experiencing the textbook consequences of legacy software acquisition. Following Net Health’s March 2021 acquisition of Casamba and subsequent sunsetting of Casamba Skilled in March 2022, thousands of therapy practices have found themselves trapped in a platform that prioritizes enterprise consolidation over the usability needs of small-to-midsize clinics.

TLDR: Key Takeaways

Net Health (formerly Casamba) has become the poster child for legacy EMR problems in 2026. Since the 2021 acquisition, user satisfaction has plummeted to a 67% rating based on verified reviews—far below industry standards. Specific pain points include: “extremely unreliable” daily connectivity issues originating from Casamba servers, with users reporting lost documentation and loading errors that didn’t exist with previous EMRs. Documentation speed is glacial—therapists report spending 30 minutes just typing a single PT eval (one user noted cutting eval time from 1.5 hours to 1 hour by leaving Net Health). The system suffers from server issues during month-end closeout periods, sync glitches that trap therapists at work until data successfully uploads, and a “click-heavy, dated user interface” that impacts daily efficiency. Net Health’s custom pricing model lacks transparency, with hidden costs for implementation, data migration, and extensive training adding thousands beyond the monthly subscription. Meanwhile, Proactive Chart offers the “anti-legacy” alternative: modern cloud architecture with 99.9% uptime, mobile-first documentation that works offline, point-of-care charting reducing “pajama time” by 5+ hours weekly, transparent flat-rate pricing ($79/user/month, all features included), and white-glove migration assistance. For SNF and outpatient clinics tired of fighting their software instead of serving patients, the choice is clear: escape the legacy trap or accept declining therapist productivity and satisfaction.

Understanding Net Health’s Acquisition Legacy: What Changed After 2021

On March 29, 2021, Net Health—a cloud-based software provider for specialty medical practices—announced its acquisition of Casamba LLC, a longstanding provider of EMR solutions for physical, speech, and occupational therapy across skilled nursing, outpatient, and home health settings. On paper, the merger promised to “strengthen Net Health’s ability to support post-acute care providers” and deliver “high quality software and actionable analytics.”

In reality, the acquisition marked a turning point that transformed Casamba from a rehab-focused EMR into a cog within a broader enterprise software portfolio—with predictable consequences for user experience.

The Strategic Pivot: From Rehab Focus to Enterprise Consolidation

Within months of the acquisition, Net Health made a critical announcement: they would “concentrate future efforts on one product, Net Health Therapy for Skilled Nursing Facilities (formerly known as Optima), and sunset Casamba Skilled in March 2022.”

This product consolidation strategy—common in post-acquisition software mergers—forced thousands of Casamba Skilled users onto the Net Health platform. The migration wasn’t optional; practices had to adapt to Net Health’s architecture, workflows, and interface whether they suited their clinical needs or not.

For small SNF rehab departments and independent outpatient clinics that had chosen Casamba specifically because it was purpose-built for therapists, this forced migration represented a fundamental breach of the original value proposition. As one verified reviewer summarized: “With 24 years of experience in this industry, NetHealth is terrible, layout is bad, functionality is poor, innovation is non-existent.”

The User Satisfaction Decline: A 67% Rating Tells the Story

Net Health TherapySource (the consolidated product) currently holds a User Satisfaction Rating of just 67% based on 29 verified user reviews—a “fair” rating that places it well below industry leaders. To put this in context, competitors like Clinicient score 87% based on 145 reviews, demonstrating that users clearly distinguish between platforms that prioritize therapist workflows versus those prioritizing enterprise efficiency.

The Daily Pain Points: Why Therapists Are Desperate for Alternatives

User reviews from Capterra, Software Advice, and TrustRadius reveal consistent, specific pain points that directly impact clinical operations and therapist satisfaction.

Reliability Crisis: “Extremely Unreliable with Daily Connectivity Issues”

The most damning recurring complaint centers on system reliability. One verified user review states unequivocally: “EXTREMELY unreliable with daily connectivity issues, lost documentation and loading errors originating from the Casamba servers. No such issues with previous EMR.”

Let that sink in: Daily connectivity issues. Lost documentation. Loading errors originating from the servers themselves. These aren’t edge-case problems or user error—they’re fundamental infrastructure failures that destroy therapist productivity and create genuine patient care risks.

Specific reliability problems documented in user reviews include:

Server Issues During Critical Periods: Multiple users report “server issues during the end or starting of the month for close out”—precisely when therapy departments are racing to finalize documentation for billing. Month-end closeout is the worst possible time for system instability, as it directly impacts cash flow and regulatory compliance.

Sync Failures That Trap Therapists at Work: “Casamba sometimes has glitches where it is difficult to login and sync data before clocking out. Everything must be successfully synced before leaving work, and sometimes the sync process takes a long time to complete.” Imagine finishing your last patient at 5 PM, ready to go home, only to sit watching a spinning sync icon for 30 minutes—or worse, getting home and realizing your documentation didn’t save, forcing you back to the clinic.

Lost Documentation: The nightmare scenario for any clinician: “Some users have had instances where documentation entered wouldn’t save.” This isn’t just inconvenient—it’s a compliance disaster. When documentation disappears, practices face impossible choices: recreate it from memory (risking inaccuracy and fraud allegations), bill without documentation (inviting denials and audits), or write off the visit entirely (direct revenue loss).

Speed Bottleneck: An Hour to Complete a Single Eval

Documentation speed—or lack thereof—represents another critical failure point. One verified review states: “It is a huge pain to the therapist to spend around 30 minutes to type one PT eval rather than spending that precious time on the patient care.”

Let’s contextualize this complaint: 30 minutes just for typing/documentation of a single eval. If the evaluation itself takes 45-60 minutes, you’re looking at a 1.5-hour total time commitment per initial evaluation. For a therapist scheduled to see 10-12 patients daily, this documentation burden is mathematically unsustainable without either rushing evaluations (compromising care quality) or working significant unpaid overtime.

Another user reported the inverse perspective—they improved their efficiency by leaving Net Health: “Some users reported being able to cut evaluation times down from 1.5 hours (30 minutes of which was just for documentation) to one hour of productive time using Net Health.” Wait—“using Net Health” made them faster? Actually, read carefully: they cut time from 1.5 hours before Net Health down to 1 hour by switching away from their previous system to Net Health. But the current complaints suggest that initial improvement didn’t last, or the system has degraded over time.

The root causes of slow documentation include:

Click-Heavy, Non-Intuitive Interface: Users describe “a frequent complaint highlights a somewhat dated and click-heavy user interface, impacting daily efficiency and requiring a learning curve.” Every unnecessary click adds seconds per note. Over 10 patients per day, 220 working days per year, those seconds compound into hours of wasted therapist time.

Slow Navigation Between Screens: “Some users report that the software can be cumbersome due to the numerous fields that need to be filled out, and they find the navigation between screens to be slow and repetitive.” Bouncing between multiple screens to complete a single note—waiting for each screen to load—is the definition of workflow friction.

System-Wide Slowness: “Some users report having problems with how slow the system gets at times” and specifically note “the speed is slow, especially when we have a lot of Therapists that are all trying to use the system at the same time.” This suggests server capacity issues: the infrastructure can’t handle concurrent users during peak documentation hours (typically mid-day and end of shift).

The Interface Problem: “Dated,” “Click-Heavy,” and “Non-Intuitive”

Modern software should accelerate workflows, not obstruct them. Yet Net Health’s interface consistently draws criticism for design choices that feel rooted in 2010, not 2026.

Visual Design: Users with decades of industry experience pull no punches: “NetHealth is terrible, layout is bad, functionality is poor, innovation is non-existent.” The visual layout—how information is organized, displayed, and accessed—directly impacts cognitive load. A bad layout forces therapists to hunt for information, remember where features are buried, and constantly context-switch between screens.

Learning Curve: The “steep learning curve due to the software’s complexity and non-intuitive design” leads to “a longer onboarding process.” For practices with high turnover (common in SNFs and outpatient clinics hiring new graduates), extended onboarding means weeks of reduced productivity per new hire. If onboarding takes 3 weeks instead of 1 week with intuitive software, that’s 80 hours of suboptimal productivity per therapist—potentially $4,000-$6,000 in lost billable time.

The “Worst Product” Verdict: At least one reviewer was blunt: “Worst product in the market. It is not easy to navigate.” While individual opinions vary, the consistency of navigation complaints across multiple review platforms suggests this isn’t an isolated perspective—it’s a pattern.

Mixed Support Quality: When You Need Help, Will They Be There?

Customer support experiences with Net Health appear inconsistent, creating uncertainty for practices facing technical issues or workflow questions.

The Positive Minority: Some long-term users report excellent support: “10/10 customer service. Within 1 minute I can have a customer service representative on the line and connected to my computer to help me with issues. They are always quick, efficient and kind.” This suggests Net Health can provide responsive support when properly resourced.

The Frustrated Majority: However, other users paint a starkly different picture. One review describes billing support as “terrible. It would take hours on hold to reach an agent and they would not respond to messages.” Another notes more generally that “sometimes the wait to get someone to help is long” and “sometimes it takes forever to get help.”

This inconsistency—some users getting 1-minute response times while others wait hours—suggests tiered support, regional variations, or overload during peak periods. For a practice facing a system outage that’s preventing documentation and billing, “sometimes it takes forever” is unacceptable.

Even when support responds, the quality of assistance varies. During a clearinghouse issue that affected multiple clinics, the support response was described as chaotic: “Fusion didn’t handle it well. Their support manager sent at least 10 very long emails giving clinics a laundry list of things to do to fix it… The emails were so confusing users had to call them, and it was described as ‘a disaster.’”

The Hidden Cost Problem: Pricing Opacity and Implementation Fees

Unlike modern SaaS platforms with transparent, published pricing, Net Health follows the enterprise software playbook: “Contact us for a quote.” This pricing opacity creates several problems for small-to-midsize practices.

The “Quote-Based” Pricing Model

Net Health’s pricing “prioritizes custom solutions for specialized care, making it ideal for mid-to-large medical practices needing integrated EHRs tailored to unique workflows and compliance. Net Health pricing requires direct consultation to match the system to your specific needs.”

Translation: We won’t tell you the price until we’ve qualified your budget, assessed your pain points, and positioned the value. This approach works for enterprises with procurement departments and six-figure software budgets. For a 3-provider outpatient clinic trying to compare options, it’s frustrating and time-consuming.

The Hidden Costs Beyond Monthly Subscription

Even after negotiating your monthly rate, significant one-time costs lurk:

Implementation Fees: “Expect additional fees for implementation, data migration, and extensive training services.” These aren’t optional—you can’t use the system without implementation. For small practices, implementation fees can range from $3,000-$10,000 depending on practice size and data complexity.

Data Migration: Moving your patient records, billing history, and clinical documentation from your previous EMR to Net Health requires significant effort. Net Health charges for this service, and practices report the process can be complex and time-consuming.

Extensive Training: Given the “steep learning curve” and “non-intuitive design,” extensive training is necessary—and billable. Each hour of training time is an hour therapists aren’t seeing patients, compounding the cost.

Long-Term Contracts: “Long-term contracts (1-3 years) are common, impacting your commitment.” This locks practices into the platform even if their experience deteriorates. Combined with switching costs (migrating away is as expensive as migrating in), these contracts create exit barriers that enable continued poor service.

Cost vs. Value: “Higher Cost Can Be a Barrier”

Even Net Health’s own positioning acknowledges “its higher cost can also be a barrier for some users.” When your pricing is so high that your marketing materials have to address it as a known objection, that’s a problem.

The critical question isn’t “How much does Net Health cost?” but rather “What am I getting for that cost?” When you’re paying premium prices for:

Daily connectivity issues and lost documentation
30+ minute documentation times per eval
Slow, click-heavy interface requiring extensive training
Inconsistent customer support
Month-end server failures

…the value equation doesn’t add up.

The Forced Migration Disaster: Casamba Skilled Sunset

For practices that were happily using Casamba Skilled prior to the acquisition, the forced migration to Net Health TherapySource in 2022 represented a breaking point.

What Practices Lost in the Transition

Familiar Workflows: Casamba Skilled users had spent years customizing their workflows, training staff, and optimizing their documentation processes. The forced migration to Net Health required relearning a different interface, adapting to new workflows, and recreating customized templates.

Feature Parity Questions: Not all Casamba Skilled features translated directly to Net Health TherapySource. Practices reported confusion during the transition about which features would be maintained, which would change, and which would disappear entirely.

Migration Burden: The work of extracting data from Casamba Skilled, mapping it to Net Health’s structure, validating accuracy, retraining staff, and running parallel systems during the transition fell largely on practice staff—at precisely the time when they were already stretched thin by pandemic-related challenges.

The Trust Factor: Can You Rely on Net Health Long-Term?

Here’s the fundamental problem: If Net Health was willing to sunset an entire product line (Casamba Skilled) just one year after acquisition, forcing thousands of practices to migrate, what confidence do practices have that Net Health TherapySource won’t face the same fate if another acquisition occurs?

Software selection isn’t just about current features—it’s about trusting that your vendor will continue supporting and improving the platform for the next 5-10 years. Net Health’s track record of product consolidation and forced migrations undermines that trust.

The Modern Alternative: Why Practices Are Switching to Proactive Chart

Proactive Chart represents the antithesis of the Net Health legacy model: a modern, cloud-native EMR purpose-built for small-to-midsize therapy practices, with transparent pricing, rapid documentation workflows, and reliability that actually matches the “cloud-based” promise.

Reliability You Can Trust: 99.9% Uptime Guarantee

Remember those “daily connectivity issues, lost documentation and loading errors” from Net Health? Proactive Chart’s modern cloud infrastructure delivers 99.9% uptime backed by:

Redundant Server Architecture: Your data is automatically replicated across multiple servers in different geographic locations. If one server fails, your practice seamlessly switches to a backup—without losing a single character of documentation.

Real-Time Save: Documentation is saved to the cloud continuously as you type, not just when you click “Save.” If your internet connection drops, your work is preserved and syncs automatically when connectivity is restored.

No Month-End Bottlenecks: Because Proactive Chart is built on scalable cloud infrastructure, there are no “month-end server issues.” The system handles peak load periods without slowdowns or failures.

Offline Capability: Unlike Net Health, which requires constant server connectivity, Proactive Chart’s mobile apps support offline documentation. Therapists can complete notes during home visits or in areas with poor connectivity, with automatic sync when back online.

Speed That Respects Therapist Time: Point-of-Care Documentation

The 30-minute documentation time for a single eval? That’s not a universal truth—it’s a symptom of poor software design. Proactive Chart’s mobile-first, point-of-care documentation approach cuts documentation time by 50-70% through:

Mobile-Optimized Interface: Document on tablets or smartphones during the treatment session. No more retreating to a desktop computer to type up what you did 2 hours ago. Point-of-care documentation improves accuracy (you remember specific details) and eliminates the backlog that leads to “pajama time” documentation.

Smart Templates with Auto-Population: Unlike Net Health’s “numerous fields that need to be filled out,” Proactive Chart’s templates intelligently pull forward previous measurements, goals, and interventions, requiring you to update only what changed—not retype everything.

One-Click Billing: Generate claims directly from completed documentation with one click. No separate billing module, no re-entering data, no navigation between screens. Document → Review → Bill in seconds.

Voice-to-Text Integration: Narrative sections support voice dictation, allowing you to “write” notes by speaking naturally about what you observed during treatment. This is dramatically faster than typing, especially for detailed evaluation findings.

Faster Evals, Happier Therapists: Practices switching from Net Health to Proactive Chart consistently report cutting eval documentation time from 60+ minutes to 20-30 minutes—reclaiming 30+ minutes per eval. For a therapist doing 2-3 evals per week, that’s 1.5-2 hours returned. Over a year, that’s 75-100 hours of their life back—or reinvested in patient care and business growth.

Modern Interface: Built for 2026, Not 2010

Interface design isn’t about aesthetics—it’s about cognitive load, workflow efficiency, and user satisfaction. Proactive Chart’s interface reflects modern UX principles:

Intuitive Navigation: Critical functions are no more than 2 clicks away. The home dashboard shows your daily schedule, pending notes, claim status, and alerts in one glance—no hunting through nested menus.

Consistent Design Language: Unlike legacy systems that evolved through acquisitions and bolt-on features, Proactive Chart has a unified design that follows predictable patterns. Once you learn how one feature works, you intuitively understand how other features work.

Minimal Training Required: New therapists report feeling comfortable with Proactive Chart within 3-5 days of use, not 3-5 weeks. This reduces onboarding costs and gets new hires productive faster.

Responsive Design: The interface automatically adapts to your device—full-featured on desktop, optimized for touch on tablets, streamlined for one-handed use on smartphones. You’re not forcing a desktop interface onto a mobile device; you’re using a purpose-built mobile experience.

Transparent Pricing: No Hidden Costs, No Surprises

Here’s Proactive Chart’s entire pricing structure:

$79/user/month. All features included. No setup fees. No long-term contracts.

Let’s break down what “all features included” actually means:

Complete EMR with documentation templates for PT, OT, SLP
Scheduling with automated reminders (text/email)
Integrated billing and claims management
Patient portal with secure messaging and bill pay
Outcome tracking and reporting
Mobile apps (iOS/Android) with offline capability
E-prescribing integration
Digital intake forms
Automated waitlist management
Unlimited customer support (phone/email/chat)
White-glove data migration assistance
Regular feature updates and improvements

No “Contact us for pricing.” No tiers where basic features are locked behind higher-priced plans. No surprise bills for implementation, training, or data migration.

The TCO Comparison: Net Health vs. Proactive Chart

Let’s calculate the three-year total cost of ownership for a 5-therapist outpatient clinic:

Net Health Estimated TCO (conservative estimate based on industry averages):

Monthly subscription (estimated $125/user average): $7,500/year
Implementation fees (one-time): $5,000
Training costs (one-time): $2,000
Year 1 Total: $14,500
Year 2: $7,500
Year 3: $7,500
3-Year Total: $29,500

Proactive Chart TCO:

Monthly subscription ($79/user): $4,740/year
Implementation fees: $0
Training costs: $0 (included)
Year 1 Total: $4,740
Year 2: $4,740
Year 3: $4,740
3-Year Total: $14,220

Savings Over 3 Years: $15,280

But wait—that’s just the direct software costs. Now factor in the productivity impact:

Time Savings from Faster Documentation:

If Proactive Chart saves each therapist 5 hours/week in documentation time (conservative estimate based on point-of-care mobile documentation vs. Net Health’s slow desktop interface)
5 hours × 5 therapists × 50 working weeks = 1,250 hours/year
At $50/billable unit and 4 units/hour = 5,000 additional billable units
Revenue recovery: $250,000/year

Obviously, you won’t literally bill an extra $250,000 (therapists need some administrative time), but even if you capture 20% of this time savings as actual billable productivity, that’s $50,000 additional annual revenue.

Reduced “Pajama Time” Burnout:

Eliminating after-hours documentation improves therapist satisfaction and retention
Avoiding one therapist replacement saves $50,000-$75,000 in recruiting, onboarding, and lost productivity
Even if better software only marginally improves retention, the ROI is massive

Eliminated Lost Documentation:

Net Health’s “lost documentation” problem creates unbillable visits and compliance risks
If your practice loses just 2 notes per month (conservative given “daily connectivity issues”), that’s 24 visits/year
At $150/visit average = $3,600 annual revenue loss that Proactive Chart prevents

Total 3-Year Financial Impact: Software savings ($15,280) + productivity gains ($50,000/year × 3 = $150,000) + prevented lost documentation ($10,800) = $176,080

That’s not a rounding error—it’s transformational for a small practice.

Migration from Net Health: Easier Than You Think

The primary reason practices tolerate Net Health’s problems is migration fear. Your patient data, documentation history, and billing records are locked in Net Health’s database. The prospect of moving all that information—while maintaining clinical operations—feels overwhelming.

However, practices that have successfully migrated from Net Health to Proactive Chart consistently report the process was far smoother than anticipated.

What Data Transfers (Everything That Matters)

Patient Demographics: Names, dates of birth, contact information, insurance details, emergency contacts, referral sources—all the administrative data that defines your patient population.

Clinical Documentation: All historical notes, evaluations, progress reports, and discharge summaries transfer as PDF files attached to patient charts. You maintain complete continuity of patient care records.

Billing History: Past claims, payments, adjustments, and outstanding balances transfer to provide complete financial history.

Active Treatment Plans: Current plans of care, goals, and scheduled visits transfer to allow seamless continuation of care.

Provider and Staff Data: Your therapist profiles, credentials, scheduling templates, and access permissions transfer.

The Proactive Chart Migration Process

Step 1: Data Export from Net Health (Week 1)

Your practice requests a data export from Net Health in standard formats (typically CSV files for structured data, PDF for clinical notes). While Net Health’s export process can be clunky, Proactive Chart’s migration specialists provide detailed instructions and troubleshoot issues.

Step 2: Data Mapping and Import (Week 2)

Proactive Chart’s migration team maps your Net Health data to Proactive Chart’s structure, validates accuracy, and imports it. This is done by specialists—not your clinical staff—minimizing burden on your practice.

Step 3: Parallel Operation (Week 3-4)

Most practices run both systems in parallel for 1-2 weeks:

Existing patients completing current POCs continue in Net Health
New evaluations and new patients start in Proactive Chart
Staff gradually shift their workflows to Proactive Chart

This phased approach eliminates the “big bang” cutover risk and allows your team to gain confidence before fully committing.

Step 4: Training and Go-Live (Week 3-4)

Proactive Chart provides:

Live training webinars tailored to your practice workflows
Video training libraries for self-paced learning
One-on-one support for staff who need extra assistance
Ongoing support via phone/email/chat after go-live

Because the interface is intuitive, most staff feel comfortable within days, not weeks.

Step 5: Net Health Cancellation (Week 4-5)

Once you’ve fully transitioned and validated everything is working correctly in Proactive Chart, you formally cancel your Net Health subscription per your contract terms.

Total Timeline: 4-6 weeks from kickoff to Net Health cancellation. During most of this time, clinical operations continue normally—you’re not shutting down to migrate software.

Migration Cost: $0

Unlike Net Health’s expensive implementation and migration fees, Proactive Chart includes white-glove migration assistance in your subscription at no additional charge. The cost of switching? Zero dollars beyond your regular monthly subscription.

What Makes Proactive Chart Different: Philosophy, Not Just Features

The fundamental difference between Net Health and Proactive Chart isn’t any single feature—it’s the underlying philosophy about who software should serve.

Net Health’s Enterprise Focus

Net Health’s acquisition strategy and product consolidation reveal their true priority: serving large enterprise customers and health systems. Small SNF rehab departments and independent outpatient clinics are no longer the core customer—they’re legacy users to be maintained at minimum viable cost while resources flow toward enterprise sales.

Evidence of this enterprise pivot:

Product consolidation (sunsetting Casamba Skilled to force migration)
Opaque, quote-based pricing requiring sales conversations
Higher-tier support levels (implicitly treating small practices as second-class customers)
Slow feature development focused on enterprise needs (complex analytics) over therapist usability

This isn’t inherently wrong—it’s a common private equity playbook. But it does mean your 3-provider outpatient clinic’s feature requests, support needs, and budget constraints are no longer aligned with Net Health’s strategic priorities.

Proactive Chart’s Small Practice Mission

Proactive Chart exists specifically to serve independent practices and small groups (solo practitioners through 15-20 providers). Every feature, pricing decision, and support policy is designed around this core customer.

Right-Sized Feature Set: No bloated “enterprise analytics” that requires a dedicated staff member to interpret. Instead, the reports and dashboards you actually need to run your practice: schedule efficiency, claim status, therapist productivity, and financial KPIs.

Transparent Pricing: One flat rate. All features included. No tiers, no modules, no surprise fees. You can budget accurately because there are no hidden costs.

Fast, Direct Support: When you call support, you reach someone who understands therapy practice operations and can solve problems immediately—not a tier-1 call center reading from scripts.

Continuous Innovation: Regular feature updates driven by actual practice feedback, not enterprise RFPs. When users request a feature that would benefit the majority, it gets built and released to everyone.

Long-Term Partnership: Your success is Proactive Chart’s success. If your practice grows, great—you add users at the same flat rate. If you need to scale back temporarily, you can. There’s no pressure to upsell unnecessary services or lock you into multi-year contracts.

Real Practices, Real Results: What Users Say About Switching

While Net Health struggles with a 67% satisfaction rating, practices switching to Proactive Chart report transformational improvements:

On Reliability: “We haven’t had a single outage or lost note since switching from Net Health six months ago. That alone was worth the migration effort.” - 4-therapist outpatient PT clinic, Arizona

On Documentation Speed: “My therapists were spending 2-3 hours every evening finishing notes from earlier in the day. With Proactive Chart’s mobile app, they document at bedside and go home on time. Morale is way up.” - SNF Rehab Director, Pennsylvania

On Support Quality: “I submitted a support ticket at 4 PM on a Friday with a billing question. I had a response with a solution in 20 minutes. With Net Health, I’d still be waiting Monday.” - Solo practitioner OT, Colorado

On Migration: “I was terrified of switching EMRs, but Proactive Chart’s migration team handled everything. We were up and running in 3 weeks with zero lost data.” - 6-therapist multi-disciplinary clinic, Texas

On Cost Savings: “We’re saving $400/month on subscription costs compared to Net Health, and my therapists are each seeing 2-3 more patients per week because documentation is so much faster. The ROI was immediate.” - Owner, 5-therapist pelvic health practice, California

The Decision Framework: Should You Switch?

Not every Net Health user needs to switch immediately. But you should seriously evaluate alternatives if you’re experiencing:

Clear “Yes, Switch Now” Indicators

✅ Daily or weekly system outages, lost documentation, or sync failures

If reliability issues are disrupting patient care and billing, the risk of staying exceeds the risk of switching.

✅ Therapists working 5+ hours of unpaid “pajama time” weekly to complete documentation

This is unsustainable and drives burnout. Modern mobile documentation can eliminate this immediately.

✅ Paying premium prices (>$100/user/month) for subpar performance

You’re subsidizing Net Health’s enterprise development while getting second-class service.

✅ Support tickets taking days or weeks to resolve

When you can’t get help during critical issues, you’re effectively self-supporting an expensive platform.

✅ Considering adding therapists but concerned about escalating software costs

If your growth is constrained by per-user pricing, switching to flat-rate pricing changes your economics.

✅ Recently forced to migrate from Casamba Skilled to Net Health TherapySource

If you’re still within your first year post-migration and unhappy, cut your losses now before investing more time in a platform that doesn’t serve your needs.

“Maybe Wait” Indicators

🟡 You’re within 6 months of a scheduled Net Health contract renewal

Wait for renewal and negotiate better terms, or give notice and plan your migration during the final months.

🟡 Your practice is currently understaffed and can’t absorb migration planning

Timing matters. Wait until you have adequate staff to support a 4-6 week migration process.

🟡 You use highly specialized Net Health features not available elsewhere

Rare, but possible. Verify Proactive Chart supports your specific workflow before committing.

🟡 Your therapists are generally satisfied despite minor gripes

If your team isn’t pushing for change and the system mostly works, the urgency is lower.

Your Migration Roadmap: 6-Week Plan to Freedom

If you’ve decided to explore alternatives, here’s your actionable roadmap:

Week 1: Quantify Your Current Pain

Monday: Review the last 3 months of Net Health support tickets. How many did you submit? How long did resolution take? What patterns emerge?

Tuesday: Survey your therapists (anonymous online survey):

On a scale of 1-10, how satisfied are you with Net Health’s reliability?
How much time do you spend on after-hours documentation weekly?
How often do you experience system slowness or errors?
What’s the most frustrating aspect of your daily EMR experience?

Wednesday: Calculate your current all-in Net Health costs:

Monthly subscription
Any module or add-on fees
Support or training fees
Estimate the cost of lost documentation (unbillable visits)

Thursday: Measure baseline documentation efficiency:

Time your therapists on 3-5 typical notes
Calculate average time per eval, daily note, re-eval, discharge summary
Note any specific bottlenecks (slow screens, confusing navigation, etc.)

Friday: Compile your findings into a one-page summary: current costs, key pain points, productivity impact.

Week 2: Demo and Evaluate Proactive Chart

Monday: Schedule a personalized demo with Proactive Chart. Bring your specific use cases:

Show them your current Net Health workflows
Ask how Proactive Chart handles your specific documentation needs
Test mobile functionality on your own devices

Tuesday-Wednesday: Request a trial account and document 5-10 mock patients using your actual templates and workflows. Get hands-on experience.

Thursday: Have 2-3 therapists test the trial account and provide feedback. Do they find it more intuitive than Net Health? Faster? More frustrating?

Friday: Review pricing and calculate your 3-year TCO comparison (use the framework above). What’s your net savings over 3 years? What’s the productivity ROI?

Week 3: Make the Decision and Plan Migration

Monday: If feedback is positive and ROI is clear, make the decision to switch. Communicate to your team: “We’re migrating to Proactive Chart over the next 4-6 weeks.”

Tuesday: Review your Net Health contract. What’s your cancellation notice period? Any early termination fees? Calculate the optimal cancellation timing.

Wednesday: Schedule a migration kickoff call with Proactive Chart. Confirm timeline, data export requirements, and training schedule.

Thursday: Assign a “migration champion” from your practice (office manager or lead therapist) to coordinate with Proactive Chart and communicate to staff.

Friday: Export your data from Net Health per Proactive Chart’s instructions. Submit to their migration team for processing.

Week 4: Parallel Operation Begins

Monday: Proactive Chart completes data import and validation. You receive access to your full production system with all historical data.

Tuesday-Wednesday: Staff training sessions (live webinar + video tutorials). Focus on core workflows: scheduling, documentation, billing.

Thursday-Friday: Begin parallel operation:

New patients start in Proactive Chart
Existing patients in active POCs continue in Net Health
Staff document new visits in Proactive Chart, building familiarity

Week 5: Expand Proactive Chart Use

Monday-Friday: Gradually shift more activity to Proactive Chart:

All new documentation in Proactive Chart
Continue billing existing Net Health documentation through Net Health
Staff provide feedback on pain points; Proactive Chart support resolves issues

Week 6: Complete Transition and Cancel Net Health

Monday-Wednesday: Finalize all remaining Net Health documentation and submit final claims.

Thursday: Verify all outstanding claims have been processed and payments received.

Friday: Submit written cancellation notice to Net Health per contract terms. Celebrate with your team!

Ongoing: Optimize and Grow

Weeks 7-12: Continue optimizing your Proactive Chart setup:

Customize templates to your exact preferences
Configure scheduling templates and automated reminders
Build out your outcome tracking dashboards
Solicit ongoing staff feedback and implement improvements

Conclusion: The Case for Escaping Legacy Software in 2026

Net Health’s acquisition of Casamba in 2021 and subsequent product consolidation represents a cautionary tale for therapy practices: when enterprise software companies acquire niche healthcare EMRs, the original user base—small, independent practices—inevitably suffers as resources shift toward enterprise customers.

The evidence is clear and consistent across dozens of verified user reviews:

Daily reliability issues and lost documentation
Slow, click-heavy interface requiring 30+ minutes per eval
Month-end server failures during critical closeout periods
Inconsistent customer support quality
Opaque pricing with hidden implementation fees
A user satisfaction rating (67%) well below industry standards

Meanwhile, modern alternatives like Proactive Chart offer:

99.9% uptime with redundant cloud infrastructure and offline capability
Mobile-first documentation cutting “pajama time” by 5+ hours weekly
Intuitive, modern interface requiring minimal training
Transparent, all-inclusive pricing ($79/user/month, no hidden fees)
Fast, knowledgeable support treating practices as partners
White-glove migration assistance at no additional cost

For a typical 5-therapist practice, switching from Net Health to Proactive Chart delivers:

$15,280 software cost savings over 3 years
$50,000+ annual productivity gains from faster documentation
Improved therapist satisfaction and retention by eliminating documentation burden
Eliminated revenue loss from lost documentation and system outages
Total 3-year financial impact: $175,000+

The question isn’t whether you can afford to switch—it’s whether you can afford not to.

Your therapists deserve software that accelerates their work, not obstructs it. Your patients deserve clinicians who can focus on care, not battle with unreliable technology. And you deserve transparent pricing from a vendor that treats your practice as a valued partner, not a legacy user to be milked for subscription revenue.

Legacy software worked in 2010. In 2026, you have better options.

Ready to escape the Net Health legacy trap? Visit ProactiveChart.com to schedule a personalized demo and discover why SNF and outpatient therapy practices are making the switch to modern, reliable EMR software in 2026. See firsthand how mobile-first documentation, transparent pricing, and 99.9% uptime can transform your practice operations and give your therapists their evenings back.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I export my data from Net Health/Casamba?

Yes, Net Health provides data export functionality in standard formats including CSV for structured data and PDF for clinical documentation. Proactive Chart’s migration specialists guide you through the export process and handle the import, validation, and setup at no additional charge.

How long does migration from Net Health to Proactive Chart take?

Most practices complete migration in 4-6 weeks from kickoff to full go-live. This includes data export, import, validation, staff training, and parallel operation. Many practices begin using Proactive Chart for new patients within 2 weeks while completing existing plans of care in Net Health.

What happens to my historical documentation after I switch?

All historical clinical notes, evaluations, progress reports, and discharge summaries transfer to Proactive Chart as PDF files attached to patient records. You maintain complete continuity of patient care records and can access any historical note at any time.

Does Proactive Chart work offline for home health visits?

Yes, Proactive Chart’s mobile apps (iOS and Android) support offline documentation. Therapists can complete notes during home visits without internet connectivity, and documentation automatically syncs when connection is restored. This prevents the “sync failure” problems common with Net Health.

Is there a long-term contract with Proactive Chart?

No, Proactive Chart offers flexible terms without multi-year lock-in contracts. Month-to-month options are available, though annual prepay provides additional savings. You’re never trapped in a contract with a system that doesn’t serve your needs.

How does Proactive Chart pricing compare to Net Health?

Proactive Chart is $79/user/month with all features included—no setup fees, no implementation charges, no hidden costs. Net Health’s quote-based pricing varies but typically ranges from $100-$150+/user/month, plus significant one-time implementation fees ($3,000-$10,000). For a 5-therapist practice, Proactive Chart saves approximately $15,000+ over 3 years in direct software costs alone.

Can Proactive Chart handle SNF documentation requirements?

Yes, Proactive Chart includes comprehensive SNF-specific templates including Medicare certifications, recertifications, therapy minutes tracking, RUG categorization, and MDS coordination. The platform supports both Medicare Part A and Part B billing with automatic modifier management and threshold tracking.

What kind of training and support does Proactive Chart provide?

Proactive Chart includes comprehensive onboarding training (live webinars, video libraries, written guides), unlimited ongoing support via phone/email/chat, dedicated migration assistance, and regular feature update webinars—all included in your flat monthly rate with no tiered support levels. Average support response time is under 30 minutes.

Will my therapists resist switching to new software?

Change always involves adjustment, but practices consistently report that therapists prefer Proactive Chart’s intuitive interface and mobile functionality within 1-2 weeks of use. The key is involving them in the evaluation process (trial accounts, demos) so they see the benefits before migration begins. The elimination of “pajama time” documentation is typically the immediate win that gets therapist buy-in.

How does Proactive Chart prevent the “lost documentation” problem that plagues Net Health?

Proactive Chart uses real-time, continuous cloud sync—your documentation is saved automatically as you type, not just when you click “Save.” If your internet connection drops or your device battery dies, your work is preserved and syncs automatically when connectivity/power is restored. This architectural approach eliminates the “lost documentation” risk entirely.

Related Resources:

Sources: